Campaigners have failed in a High Court bid to force the UK Government to spend more to end fuel poverty.
A senior judge ruled yesterday that government departments were not legally obliged to take action "whatever the cost".
Mr Justice McCombe, sitting in London, dismissed an application for judicial review brought by Friends of the Earth and Help the Aged to force the government to meet targets for helping millions of vulnerable citizens who cannot heat their homes adequately.
The pressure groups said fuel poverty was "a blight upon society" and five million households are expected to suffer its consequences this winter.
Even though they lost their legal challenge, they later called on the government to do more to help the fuel poor.
A fuel poverty strategy was introduced under the Warm Homes and Energy Conservation Act 2000 with the stated intention of doing everything "reasonably practicable" to end fuel poverty among vulnerable households by 2010 and in all households in England by 2016.
Critics accused the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) and the Secretary of State for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform (BERR) of taking insufficient measures to meet their commitments and said the courts should intervene.
Government lawyers argued the departments were doing their best in the face of budgetary constraints and dramatic increases in energy prices, and there had been no breach of legal duty.
Mr Justice McCombe said the government had taken up the challenge to eliminate fuel poverty by specifying that it would try, so far as reasonably practicable, to achieve the targets.
He added: "In doing so, it imported a statutory duty to make those efforts. It did not assume a statutory duty to achieve the desired results, whatever the cost."
Later, Friends of the Earth's head of UK climate Ed Matthew said: "The High Court's decision reveals a huge loophole in the legal protection for people in fuel poverty - big enough for over millions of households to fall through.
"Today's ruling means that it can spend pretty much what it likes and implement a strategy which is seven years old and very vague, making the warm homes legislation almost worthless.
"We need a proper plan that makes sure that every home struggling to keep warm is properly insulated."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article